On Cloud and ASICS are the most prominent shoe manufacturers who craft high-performing shoes for various running needs.
But which brand offers the best shoes for your running style, goals, and preferences?
To answer that question, I have tested several models from both brands based on performance, durability, stability, and cushioning.
Throughout this comparison, I will share my findings and track down the best shoes from both brands.
Without further ado, let’s begin!
A Quick Brand Overview of ASICS and On Cloud
The origin of ASICS dates back to 1949 when Kihachiro Onitsuka introduced a new brand for manufacturing sports goods for the youth of Japan.
In the late 1970s, Asics launched its first-ever running shoe and soon became the world’s most influential sports brand.
While primarily focused on performance and technology, ASICS has introduced a wide range of shoes for various sports and activities.
With numerous proprietary technologies, Asics offers the best shoes with comfort and stability.
Along with the top-notch high-performance running shoes, Asics also manufactures shoes for walking, training, basketball, tennis, volleyball, and so on.
Among thousands of shoe models, Asics has numerous popular shoes, such as Gel-Kayano, Gel-Nimbus, GT-2000, Novablast, etc.
But what about the On Cloud?
On Cloud didn’t have a legacy like ASICS, as they are a newcomer to the shoe manufacturing industry. It was established in 2010 in Switzerland by three retired professional athletes.
In 2014 and 2015, professional athletes around the globe started wearing and running on On Cloud shoes, making them extremely popular among shoe enthusiasts and sneakerheads.
On Cloud shoes are instantly recognizable due to the innovative CloudTec sole technology and individual cloud-shaped pods.
These shoes offer great comfort, excellent style, breathable design, and lightweight build.
Some of the most prominent models from On Cloud are Cloudmonster, Cloudeclipse, Cloudstratus 3, Cloudflyer 4, Clouldboom Echo, etc.
Attribute Comparison of On Cloud and ASICS
Both shoe manufacturers have unique proprietary materials and design patterns due to their distinct origins.
But some aspects set them apart.
Consider the subsequent attribute comparison table to understand both brands’ diverse characteristics and features.
| Attribute | On Cloud | ASICS |
|---|---|---|
| Brand Overview | New Swiss manufacturer best known for comfortable, stylish, and versatile shoes | Japanese established powerhouse, best known for stability & high-tech cushioning |
| Colorways | More subtle colorways | Bold and vibrant colorways |
| Upper | Lightweight and breathable mesh upper that utilizes recycled materials | Mesh or engineered knit uppers for maximum breathability |
| Insole | Removable mesh and foam insoles | Removable OrthoLite insoles |
| Midsole | CloudTec pods, Helion foam, CleanCloud EVA foam, Speedboard | FlyteFoam, FF Blast Plus, Gel cushioning |
| Outsole | Rubber outsole with zonal rubber placement | AHAR (Asics High Abrasion Rubber) |
| Cushioning | Lightweight and bouncy | Plush, supportive, and energetic |
| Fit | True-to-size | True-to-size |
| Traction | Smooth transitions over aggressive grip | Good on most surfaces |
| Toebox | Standard | Narrow |
| Stability | Neutral | Depending on the model, some offer excellent stability for neutral, overpronation, and supination. |
| Flexibility | More flexible | Usually less flexible than On Cloud shoes |
| Durability | Good durability with an average of 300-350 miles | Extremely durable, some models last 450-500 miles |
| Versatility | Good for everyday running, walking, and light gym workouts | Focused on performance running |
| Breathability | Excellent breathability but highly depends on upper materials | Excellent breathability |
| Lacing System | Regular laces | Traditional lacing system |
| Weight | Lightweight | Highly depends on the model, usually heavier than On Cloud shoes |
| Price Range | $130-260 | $55-250 |
| Best for | Runners who prioritize comfort and a soft, cloud-like feel | Runners who need stability, durability, and versatility |
Key Differences between On Cloud and ASICS
The apparent difference between both brand’s shoes is in the shoe silhouettes and the material used to manufacture the shoes.
Both manufacturers have proprietary materials and offer a diverse range of shoe categories. In addition, there are also considerable divergences in performance, stability, durability, traction, and cushioning.
Let’s compare both brand’s characteristics and offerings to track down the best shoes.
1. Diverse Shoe Categories
Due to its early adoption and a long history of manufacturing shoes, ASICS has a wide range of shoe categories.
From high-competitive running tracks to the wrestling mat, Asics has almost every type of shoe you will ever need.
Conversely, On Cloud is a newcomer to the shoe industry, but it still offers a diverse range of shoe categories.
Following is the table of the most popular shoes from On Cloud.
| Category | Shoe Models |
|---|---|
| Road running shoes | Cloudmonster, Cloud X 3, Cloudeclipse, Cloudswift 3, Cloudboom Echo 3 |
| Hiking shoes & boots | Cloudrock 2 Waterproof, Cloudventure Peak 3, Cloudvista, Cloudtrax, Cloudventure |
| Trail running shoes | Cloudventure Peak 3, Cloudvista, Cloudultra 2, Cloudventure |
| Lifestyle shoes | Cloudnova Flux, Cloud 5, Cloudnova Form, Cloudtilt LOEWE, Cloud X 3 AD |
| Tennis shoes | THE ROGER Pro, THE ROGER Pro Clay |
| Track & Field shoes | Cloudspike 10000m, Cloudspike 1500m |
As you can see, On Cloud is manufacturing shoes for only a few categories. But that does not apply to ASICS.
Asics has a broader and more diverse shoe category. For a better understanding, consider the subsequent table.
| Category | Shoe Model |
|---|---|
| Stability running shoes | Gel-Kayano 28, GT-2000 10, Gel-Kayano Lite |
| Cushioning/neutral running shoes | Gel-Nimbus 24, Gel-Cumulus 23, Gel-Quantum 360 |
| Racing shoes | MetaSpeed Sky, MetaRacer Tokyo, Gel-DS Trainer 26 |
| Training shoes | Gel-Quantum 180, Gel-Craze TR 4, Gel-Fit Sana 4 |
| Walking shoes | Gel-Contend Walker, Gel-Quickwalk 3, Gel-Excite 8 |
| Trail running shoes | Gel-Fujitrabuco Sky, Gel-Venture 8, Gel-Sonoma 6 |
| Wrestling shoes | MATFLEX 7, SPLIT ELITE, MATCONTROL 3, AGGRESSOR 5 |
| Volleyball shoes | SKY ELITE FF MT 2, UPCOURT 5, GEL-ROCKET 11, GEL-TACTIC 12 |
| Golf shoes | GEL-KAYANO ACE 2, GEL-KAYANO ACE BOA, GEL-COURSE GLIDE MEN |
| Soccer shoes | GEL-COURSE GLIDE MEN, DS LIGHT CLUB AG, DS LIGHT CLUB TF WIDE |
ASICS outshines the On Cloud with its more extensive categories and shoe models for each category.
2. Technology and Material
Like any other prominent shoe manufacturer, both brands utilize their proprietary technologies and materials to construct top-notch shoes for various indoor and outdoor activities.
Though On Cloud didn’t have a huge list of innovative technologies, they still use top-notch materials and techs to construct their shoes.
Following are the most used techs of On Cloud shoes.
| On Cloud’s Technology | Description |
|---|---|
| CloudTec Pods | Signature cloud-shaped pods for a soft, cushioned, and cloud-like feel. |
| Helion EVA Foam | Proprietary foam compound used in CloudTec pods. |
| Speedboard | Responsive TPU plate that propels forward. |
| Reflective Details | Enhance visibility in low-light conditions. |
| Missiongrip Rubber Outsoles | High-performance rubber for excellent traction. |
Due to its long history and developments, Asics has more proprietary techs. Following are the best technologies from Asics.
| Asics’s Technology | Description |
|---|---|
| GEL Technology | Visible silicone Gel for shock absorption and smooth transition. |
| FlyteFoam | Lightweight and responsive midsole foam for exceptional energy return. |
| FF BLAST | Cushioning foam for bounce and shock absorption. |
| FF BLAST Turbo | Softer FF BLAST with a carbon fiber plate. |
| DUOMAX System | Dual-density midsole for overpronators. |
| GUIDANCE TRUSSTIC | Stabilizing plate under the midfoot. |
| OrthoLite Insoles | Breathable and moisture-wicking insole. |
| AHAR and AHARPLUS Outsole | Durable rubber outsole with excellent grip. |
Asics’ product offerings are more comparable with New Balance. Check out the similarities and dissimilarities of ASICS and New Balance shoes.
In summary, ASICS surpasses the On Cloud with a wide range of shoe categories for various needs.
3. Cushioning & Breathability
Cushioning is a great concern for running shoes, and On Cloud shoes feature CloudTec technology, which can dramatically compress with each step and absorb the impact.
This proprietary technology gives the On Cloud shoes an exceptional look and feel.
Most importantly, this high shock absorption tech features a cloud-like feel, which is why it is called CloudTec.
There are three types of CloudTec. One is an uncompressed cloud, and the other two compresses vertically and horizontally.
Though On Cloud shoes are highly cushioned, they aren’t as plush as other comfy shoes.
On the other hand, Asics utilizes Flytefoam for the midsole cushioning, which is widely known for its exceptional softness and bouncy nature.
Depending on shoe models and lineups, Asics often go for the FF Blast Plus and FF Blast Turbo foams, the lightest and bounciest midsole material.
Another proprietary cushioning technology from Asics is the Pure Gel. Asics utilizes visible gel units for Gel-Nimbus and Gel-Cumulus shoes.
This gel technology assists in absorbing the shock with every stride, making a comfortable ride even on uneven surfaces.
In terms of breathability, both brands offer the best breathable upper materials.
For instance, the breathable mesh upper of On Cloud shoes ensures the best ventilation, which keeps your feet cool even in hot climates.
Though Asics also uses the mesh upper for numerous models, they often choose Engineered knit upper for a more durable construction.
This knit upper is less breathable than mesh. Fortunately, some knit uppers are still highly breathable due to their unique structure.
In short, Asics surpasses On Cloud with multiple cushioning tech. But On Cloud has more breathable upper construction.
4. Peak Performance
Comparing the performance of two shoe giants is a little tricky. For easier understanding, I will compare the performance of Cloudstratus and Novablast.
I use these for my daily runs and am satisfied with their performance.
The Cloudstratus is the most cushioning among On Cloud models, thanks to its Helion EVA foam and multiple CloudTec pods.
Due to the plush cushioning, this model is less responsive than the Novablast. But the plush cushioning makes it preferable for long-distance running and everyday comfort.
Novablast, on the other hand, is a highly responsive shoe, thanks to its FlyteFoam Blast foam and propulsive Pebax plate. It’s my trusted companion for faster pace and tempo workouts.
The high-tech build materials make it more durable than Cloudstratus and more versatile for various running styles.
Now, let’s get back to the overall brand performance.
While Asics Magic Speed and Metaspeed shoes utilize premium carbon plates for propelling forward, On Cloud uses a TPU plate to achieve the same.
But obviously, carbon plates offer the best performance compared to plastic plates.
Moreover, Asics utilizes more advanced features like GUIDANCE TRUSSTIC and DUOMAX System for crafting high-performance running shoes, while On Cloud rearranges some materials to deliver the performance.
Both brands have high-performance shoes, but ASICS offers the best technologies and outshines the On Cloud with superior performance.
5. Durability and Traction
Both shoes are highly durable and built to last.
With the sturdy mesh upper and responsive CloudTec, On Cloud shoes have a lifespan of around 300 to 350 miles.
The Missiongrip rubber outsoles of the On Cloud shoes ensure excellent grip on most surfaces and can effortlessly handle various terrains.
As an On Cloud 5 Ready user, I am really impressed with its longevity.
I have completed more than 300 miles, and still, it looks like a new one. But you must use and maintain On Cloud shoes properly for the best lifespan.
Conversely, Asics’s padded mesh or knit upper and AHAR rubber outsole are widely known for their durability and superior grip.
After using the Novablast 3 and Nimbus 25 for several years, I discovered these shoes are made to last for a long time.
A similar compliment applies to other Asics’s running shoes.
The AHARPLUS outsole can easily last 450 to 500 miles without showing any tear and wear. And the AHARGRIP ensures the best traction, even on wet surfaces.
Both brands’ shoes are durable, but ASICS’s shoes surpass On Cloud shoes with the durable AHAR rubber outsole, more sturdy upper materials, and superior grip.
6. Fit, Sizing, & Stability
It’s hard to compare both brands’ fits and sizes due to the extensive lineups and shoe models.
However, most models from both brands are true-to-size, but there are exceptions. For instance, the On Cloud shoe sizing varies depending on the model, and with every new model, they introduce different fits.
On Cloud shoes are TTS in terms of length. These shoes feature a narrow fit, with little more room in the toe box, but surely they will snugly fit your feet.
For example, the Cloudflow, Cloudflyer, and Cloudswift shoes are perfect for normal feet and can also serve people with wide feet.
But the Cloudmoster or Cloudvista models are more suitable for wide feet.
On the contrary, Asics offers a very traditional fit for most shoes and is true-to-size. The toe box has a lot of space for moving your feet.
I love the snug fit of Asics shoes.
You may need to go a half size up for On Cloud shoes, but you can undoubtedly go for the regular size while choosing the Asics shoes.
Consider the subsequent sizing chart for both brands for a more precise understanding.
Men’s Shoe Fit and Sizing
| Brand | US 9.5 | US 10 | US 10.5 | US 11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| On Cloud | 27.5 cm | 28 cm | 28.5 cm | 29 cm |
| ASICS | 27.5 cm | 28 cm | 28.25 cm | 28.5 cm |
Women’s Shoe Fit and Sizing
| Brand | US 8 | US 8.5 | US 9 | US 9.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| On Cloud | 25 cm | 25.5 cm | 26 cm | 26.5 cm |
| ASICS | 25 cm | 25.5 cm | 25.75 cm | 26 cm |
As you can see, there are some differences in shoe sizing for both brands, so I suggest, try on them before buying your favorite pair from these brands.
Now, let’s talk about stability.
On Running doesn’t have any stability features or technologies; instead, it relies on altering the position of certain elements that slow down the inward roll.
Conversely, Asics is the king of stability.
Utilizing the DUOMAX System and GUIDANCE TRUSSTIC technologies, Asics offers some of the best stability shoes.
The DUOMAX System assists in stabilization, and the GUIDANCE TRUSSTIC features a stabilizing plate under the midfoot.
For instance, ASICS Gel-Kayano 30 and Gel-Kayano 29 are the most stable shoes. These shoes are preferable for overpronators and underpronators.
Both brands offer a snug and secure fit with proper sizing. However, Asics is taking the lead with its stability feature.
7. Price and Significance
The price points of both shoe brands are pretty comparable. While the average price of On Cloud shoes is around $130-260, Asics shoes are available from $55-250.
However, some special editions or specialty items (carbon plates) can cost a lot more.
Let me clarify with an example.
The price of Cloudtilt LOEWE is $490, which is ridiculous. In addition, KENZO X GEL-KAYANO 20 has a price tag of $350.
Moreover, both brands offer discounted shoes, and you can grab your favorite pair without breaking the bank.
8. Collaborations & Revenue
As On Cloud is a newcomer to the shoe manufacturing industry, there is no significant collaboration.
In recent years, On Cloud has focused more on collaboration and has already collaborated with LOEWE, Bang & Olufsen, and POST ARCHIVE FACTIOn (PAF) to extend the running culture.
ASICS has a long reputation in the shoe industry and collaborates with numerous influencers and companies.
Among numerous collaborations, some of the biggest ones are the collaborations with Andersson Bell, Awake NY, Brain Dead, Cecilie Bahnsen, Dime, JJJJound, Kiko Kostadinov, Sean Wotherspoon, Vivienne Westwood, and so on.
Both companies are generating a handsome amount of revenue to fuel the developments.
On Cloud’s full-year revenue was $1.39 billion in 2022, a 69% increase from the previous year.
On the contrary, ASICS’s annual revenue for 2022 was $3.699 billion, which is 0.6% more than the last year.
The number clearly indicates the rapid growth of On Cloud. However, Asics has a more stable revenue, which is still increasing.
In short, ASICS outshines the On Cloud with its vast collaborations and colossal revenue.
Pros & Cons of On Cloud and ASICS
With the comparison of both brands, it’s clear that both offer the best shoes for various running styles and individual needs.
But before concluding and finalizing your acquiring decision, you must consider the advantages and drawbacks of both brands to pick the most appropriate one.
Following are the merits and demerits of On Cloud and ASICS shoes.
On Cloud
- »Lightweight design and responsive cushioning.
- »Sleek and stylish design.
- »Versatile and suitable for various activities.
- »Breathable mesh uppers keep the feet cool.
- »Features snug fit and speed lacing system.
- »Less durable than Asics, especially the CloudTec pods.
- »Limited stability options.
ASICS
- »Extraordinary cushioning and stability.
- »Ultra-durable construction.
- »Decent stability and support.
- »Numerous lineups and models.
- »Best bang for the buck.
- »Narrow toe box.
- »Heavier than On Cloud shoes.
On Cloud vs ASICS: Who Provides the Top-Tier Shoe Choices?
Ultimately, the best option depends entirely on your individual needs and style preferences.
If you want cloud-like comfort, Cloudstratus is the best choice. For a lightweight and responsive feel, choose CloudSwift or Cloudventure.
Contrarily, if you’re seeking stability and overpronation control, go with Kayano or GT-2000. For responsiveness and high performance, pick Novablast or Metaspeed.
In case you’re looking for a versatile trainer for various running activities, the ultimate pick is the Gel-Kayano and Gel-Nimbus.
Frequently Asked Questions
What shoe brand is comparable to On Cloud?
Hoka is the most comparable shoe brand, and it was established one year earlier than On Cloud. However, On Cloud and Brooks are also head-to-head comparable with each other due to their similar features and models.
Are On Clouds or Asics better for walking?
On Cloud shoes are immensely popular due to their outstanding performance for all types of walking. Asics shoes are also very suitable for walking because of their stability feature. However, On Cloud is a better choice for walking because of the perfect balance of cushioning and support.
Are ASICS good for walking on concrete?
For walking on concrete or asphalt, you will need a shoe that features extensive cushioning and absorbs the impact of each step. Asics has numerous shoes that are highly preferable for walking on hard surfaces like concrete, such as Gel-Cumulus, Gel-Kayano, and Gel-Nimbus.
Are On Cloud shoes good for knees?
Due to the extensive cushioning and CloudTec Pods, On Cloud shoes are suitable for saving your knees from injury or pain. For example, the Cloud Monster model of On Cloud ensures a joyful, knee-pain-free run while ensuring the most outstanding comfort.
