Asics Gel-Kayano 28 Vs GT 2000 9: Which One Is Better?

Written By Sunny

Asics runners have always been the preferred arsenal for overpronators, especially those who are seeking supportive strides.

On that note, the GEL-KAYANO 28 and GT 2000 9 have been some of the most popular runners with exceptional performance.

But which one of these is the best-suited option for you?asics-gel-kayano-28-vs-asics-gt-2000-9

Let’s lace up both pairs and find out.

A Quick Overview of the Asics Gel-Kayano 28 and GT 2000 9

Although the GT 2000 9 was released a few years prior to the GEL-KAYANO 28, both kicks are still among the top contenders for stability.

Starting with the older model, the Asics GT 2000 9 still retains the DNA of this lineup, offering robust shock absorption and a stable platform. It’s an iconic running shoe that proudly boasts all the innovations to provide a smoother running experience.

Meanwhile, the GEL-KAYANO is Asics’ flagship lineup for high-performance runners.

The GEL-KAYANO 28 incorporates the best technology and design of the said brand. From the supportive feel to the exceptional cushioning, these shoes are the best ones that Asics has to offer.

In a sense, the GEL-KAYANO and GT-2000 shoes aren’t direct competitors but rather complementary offerings.

Feature Comparison Between Asics GT 2000 9 and Gel-Kayano 28

Despite being in the same footwear category from the same brand, there are quite a few variances between the feature sets of these runners.

Check out the following side-by-side comparison between Gel-Kayano 28 and GT-2000 9 to get a better understanding.

FeaturesAsics GT 2000 9Asics GEL-KAYANO 28
Weight9.9oz(US men’s size 9)10.9oz(US men’s size 9)
SizingTrue to size with a narrower heelTrue to size
Upper materialEngineered mesh, made from recycled materialEngineered mesh
InsoleRemovable SpEVA socklinerOrthoLite X-55 sockliner
MidsoleFlyteFoam + Lite TrussticFlyteFoam Propel, FlyteFoam Lite + Rearfoot Gel cushioning
CushioningResponsive and slightly firmerPlush and deep
StabilityModerately stable with medial postVery stable with a medial post
Stack height12-22mm13-23mm
OutsoleAHARAHAR(Asics High Abrasion Rubber) Plus
Best forTempo runs, daily training, lighter weight, mild to moderate overpronationLong runs, high mileage, maximum comfort, overpronation
Price rangeAround $120Around $160

The differences in certain attributes aren’t just for show.

Trust me; after rocking these shoes for the past few months, they offer a noticeably distinct experience.

Key Differences Between Asics Gel-Kayano 28 & GT-2000 9 Runners

The Asics GEL-KAYANO 28 and GT-2000 9 do a great job of delivering their primary focus: a stable running experience.

However, if we put them next to each other, there are a few major and minor differences between these shoes that stand out. Such as the design, running performance, implemented technologies, etc.

Here are some notable differences between Asics Gel-Kayano 28 and GT-2000 9 that you should know about:

1. Upper Construction

These shoes might have some obvious similarities in their upper construction, but they differ quite a lot in certain design elements and material choices.

Design Language

The Gel-Kayano 28 has a bulky and mean look to it. The seamless, one-piece construction of the upper material gives a streamlined and modern silhouette.

It has a more minimalistic design and a less prominent logo that radiates premium style.

Meanwhile, the GT-2000 9 infuses a classic vibe with a prominent logo and eye-catching

Both shoes have moderate colorways that can be worn up or down with any regular outfit.

Upper Material

These Asics shoes utilize engineered mesh that is not only breathable but also enhances the overall look of these runners. The interior of these shoes has an OrthoLite sockliner for moisture management and comfort.

However, the GT-2000 9 opted for recycled material, making it more eco-friendly at the cost of less breathability.

Furthermore, the synthetic overlays of these shoes are slightly thicker and more supportive on the GT-2000 9.


The GEL-KAYANO 28 has a gusseted tongue with adequate padding that provides enough space and comfort to your midfoot.

Since these kinds of tongues are attached to the upper on both sides, they don’t slide around while you’re running or doing some high-movement activities. Such a feature is sorely lacking in the GT-2000 9.

But its tongue has decent padding and a medium profile similar to the Gel-Kayano.

Overall, the Asics Gel-Kayano 28 gets the upper hand(pun intended) due to its premium look and better upper elements.upper-construction-of-gel-kayano-28

2. Insole Implementation

The GT-2000 9 has a removable insole made from SpEVA foam.

It might not win any award for moisture absorption, but it provides decent cushioning while being lightweight.

The Gel-Kayano 28, on the other hand, boasts an integrated OrthoLite X-55 insole for uncompromising comfort and moisture management for sweaty feet.

Although it’s not removable or as customizable as the GT-2000 9’s insole, the GEL-KAYANO 28 offers the right kind of insole needed for running or daily training.

3. Midsole and Comfort

The midsole of the Gel-Kayano features a blend of FlyteFoam Blast and FlyteFoam Propel technologies.

The FF Blast provides plush underfoot cushioning, while the FF Propel offers a responsive and springy ride.

As a result, you can easily achieve faster speed without worrying about foot fatigue or balance.

The generous Gel cushioning in its thick midsole also provides excellent shock absorption and foot pampering, which is suitable for long sessions.

But, such abundant cushioning comes at the cost of increased weight and less stability.

Thankfully, Asics managed to solve the stability issue by providing a wider platform and adequate supportive overlays.

Switching over to the GT-2000 9, it utilizes the FlyteFoam Propel throughout the midsole.midsole-and-comfort-of-gt-2000-9

It’s a firmer material that provides a more responsive ride compared to the Gel-Kayano 28.

Although this kick might not have a “GEL” in its name, Gel units are present in the rearfoot and forefoot areas for targeted shock absorption.

But it’s not as effective as the Kayano.

It’s also noticeably less comfortable for high-performance workouts and doesn’t offer as bouncy feel as the competitor.

As the GEL-KAYANO offers a comfortable and propelling ride without sacrificing stability, its midsole implementation takes the win over the GT-2000.

4. Outsole and Durability

Both the Asics Gel-Kayano 28 and GT-2000 9 utilize durable outsoles that can handle any terrain or condition. But upon closer inspection, there are some differences in the used technology and grooving.

While the GT-2000 9 uses the standard AHAR(Asics High Abrasion Rubber) for its outsole coverage, the Gel-Kayano 28 goes beyond that by using the AHAR Plus.

As a result, the latter provides better abrasion resistance and long-lasting grip in key areas like heel or forefoot.

And that’s not all!

Dynamic DuoMax Support system(dual-density medial post) is present in both shoes for enhanced stability during transitions.

But the Gel-Kayano takes things up a notch by incorporating a Trusstic system.

It’s a supportive shank in the midfoot that provides a lighter sole unit without losing any structural integrity.

The Gel-Kayano also has ventilation in its outsole to increase breathability, which is crucial for long runs.gel-kayano-vs-gt-2000-9-outsole

Keep in mind that the outsole flexes more readily in the GT’s forefoot compared to Kayano’s, thanks to using Gel units in the midfoot break of the outsole.

It might offer a smoother toe-off, but I noticed early signs of wear and tear in that area.

Overall, the Gel-Kayano 28 has a more durable midsole that also offers additional stability and breathability for running or workouts.

5. Fit, Weight, and Sizing

Despite both shoes running true-to-size, the GT 2000 9 fits slightly snugger than the Gel-Kayano 28, especially in the heel and midfoot.

Both sides have their unique advantages for such different fits.

The wider feet accommodation and plush upper of the GEL-KAYANO 28 are suitable for those who want a snug yet relaxing fit.

On the flip side, the complete foot lockdown feel and firmer control of the GT-2000 9 shoes are ideal for runners with narrow feet.

Both shoes are available in men’s and women’s sizes, with options for half sizes.

Be that as it may, you should try on both shoes and go with a half-size up or down, depending on your foot shape and preference.

Toe Box

The Gel-Kayano 28 has a more spacious toe box than the GT-2000 9, which also provides extra room for toe wiggle.

Protective toe puffs are present in both shoes for protection against debris.


The Gel-Kayano not only looks bulkier compared to the GT-2000, but it is also bulkier in nature as well due to incorporating so many innovations.

The GT-2000 9 is around 1 ounce lighter for the US men’s size 9.weight-of-gt-2000-9

This attribute offers a bit more agility and a nimble feel to this shoe, making it suitable for tempo runs or casual workouts.


Asics Gel-Kayano has a standard 6-eyelet lacing system for an adjustable fit, which is ideal for most foot shapes. The same can not be said about the GT-2000 9.

The latter takes a different approach with a higher density of eyelets in the midfoot area. It still has a 6-eyelet lacing but has more structural overlays in the eyestays for better support.

That being said, both shoes have an extra eyelet for additional heel lockdown.

Nonetheless, the Asics GEL-KAYANO 28 should be ideal for most runners due to its roomier yet snug fit and better support against bunions or blistering.

6. Running Performance

Asics GEL-KAYANO 28 is more built-up in stability compared to the GT-2000 9. Its utilization of both DuoMax and Trusstic systems prevents inward rolling and adds guidance for overpronators.

Such an implementation is crucial for high-mileage, fast-paced running.

Not to mention, the plush cushioning delivers a smooth and comfortable ride, particularly in heel strikes. A slightly more flexibility in the forefoot also contributes a lot in this regard.

The GT-2000 9 might be more agile than the Kayano, but its narrower platform and less stable midsole make it less appealing.running-performance-of-gt-2000-9

However, it has an excellent responsiveness for smooth transitions during the gait cycle.

Furthermore, its firmer and more dynamic feel encourages midfoot and forefoot strikes during fast runs.

If you want both stability and comfort for various running styles, the Asics Gel-Kayano 28 will surely win your heart, with the GT-2000 9 trailing close behind.

7. Price to Value Proposition

Now, the only remaining question is: which offers a better price-to-performance ratio?

The Gel-Kayano is around $40 more expensive than the GT-2000 9 in the current market.

To be frank, it’s worth spending that extra bucks if you want uncompromising stability and top-of-the-line innovation from your running pair.

Considering all the previously discussed attributes, the Asics Gel-Kayano 28 has a better value proposition compared to the Asics GT 2000 9.

Pros and Cons of the Asics Gel-Kayano 28 and Asics GT 2000 9

It won’t do any justice to these runners if we don’t go over their individual strengths and weaknesses.

The following pros and cons of the GEL-KAYANO 28 and GT-2000 9 from ASICS should put things into perspective.

Asics Gel-Kayano 28

  • »Plush cushioning for impact absorption.
  • »Comfortable for long runs.
  • »Breathable upper.
  • »Stable platform with pronounced medial post.
  • »Premium materials with durable construction.
  • »Feels heavier and bulkier.
  • »More expensive.
  • »Less ideal for tempo runs.

Asics GT 2000 9

  • »Lighter and more responsive.
  • »More affordable and versatile wear.
  • »Suitable for fast-paced tempo runs.
  • »Eco-friendly material.
  • »Less stable.
  • »Not suitable for long runs.
  • »Less durable.

Asics Gel-Kayano 28 Vs Asics GT 2000 9: The Best Runner for You

The Gel-Kayano 28 should be at the top of your purchase list as it offers luxurious comfort, plush cushioning, and robust stability. For high-mileage runs or pronounced overpronation, it will deliver a much better running experience than the GT-2000 9 from Asics.

But we can’t deny the responsive ride and agility that the latter offers, especially at that price range.

The GT-2000 9 is an easy alternative to the Gel-Kayano if you want to save some money without sacrificing too much.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Asics GT 2000 9 suitable for flat feet?

Yes. The midfoot arch and the offset of the Asics GT 2000 9 provide decent stability and support for anyone with flat feet.

Are the Asics Gel Kayano shoes good for running?

Yes. The GEL-KAYANO 28 from Asics is an amazing running shoe thanks to its excellent stability and plush cushioning.

What is the most comfortable ASICS model?

The Gel-Nimbus 24 is currently the most comfortable shoe from ASICS. Gel-Cumulus 24 also trails close behind as a plush runner.

What’s the difference between the Asics GT 2000 12 and GT 2000 9?

Asics GT-2000 12 is much lighter and incorporates updated material compared to the GT-2000 9. The newer model also has a higher heel drop than the older one.

Which is best, Asics Gel Kayano 30 or GT 2000 12?

The Gel-Kayano 30 from Asics is a better option than the GT-2000 12, especially if you want a comfortable and luxurious ride for long sessions.

About The Author
Sunny is all about action and activities. He finds it difficult to contain himself. Be it motorcycling, playing football, or exploring the great outdoors, he loves to keep his legs busy.Sunny quickly realized the importance of footwear to keep himself going healthily. This was when he decided to share all his knowledge and expertise regarding different footwear and their significance.Now, he’s on a mission with this humble platform by his side. With time he plans on doing bigger and better things.Apart from his writing and other hobbies, he loves spending time with his cat Sophie. He loves to cook for his friends and family too.

Leave a Comment